Huawei podnikol \u010fal\u0161\u00ed krok vo svojom pr\u00e1vnom pr\u00edpade proti vl\u00e1de USA v snahe ur\u00fdchli\u0165 cel\u00fd proces.<\/p>\n
V marci Huawei podal \u017ealobu proti USA tvrdiac, \u017ee z\u00e1kon, ktor\u00fd zakazuje vl\u00e1dnym agent\u00faram n\u00e1kup produktov \u010d\u00ednskeho giganta, je proti\u00fastavn\u00fd.<\/p>\n
S\u00fadny proces sa zameriava na ustanovenie v z\u00e1kone zn\u00e1mom ako N\u00e1rodn\u00fd z\u00e1kon o autoriz\u00e1cii obrany (NDAA). \u00a7 889 tohto z\u00e1kona zakazuje v\u00fdkonn\u00fdm vl\u00e1dnym org\u00e1nom obstar\u00e1va\u0165 si telekomunika\u010dn\u00e9 zariadenia od spolo\u010dnosti Huawei a konkuren\u010dn\u00e9ho ZTE . Obe zna\u010dky s\u00fa explicitne uveden\u00e9 v z\u00e1kone.<\/p>\n
Teraz Huawei podal na s\u00fad nie\u010do, \u010do je zn\u00e1me ako \u201emotion for summary\u201c. Je to po\u017eiadavka, aby s\u00fad rozhodol v prospech Huaweiu e\u0161te predt\u00fdm, ako prebehne konven\u010dn\u00fd s\u00fadny proces, a to na z\u00e1klade objekt\u00edvnych pr\u00e1vnych vyhodnoten\u00ed.<\/p>\n
S\u00fad v Texase napl\u00e1noval pojedn\u00e1vanie na 19. septembra 2019, ale proces sa m\u00f4\u017ee o\u010dak\u00e1vane natiahnu\u0165 na nieko\u013eko rokov.<\/p>\n
Cie\u013eom Huaweiu je cel\u00fd proces ur\u00fdchli\u0165. Ak s\u00fad rozhodne v prospech \u010d\u00ednskeho technologick\u00e9ho giganta, nebude potrebn\u00fd \u00fapln\u00fd s\u00fadny proces. Pr\u00e1vnici pre americk\u00fa vl\u00e1du by v\u0161ak mohli po\u017eiada\u0165 s\u00fad, aby n\u00e1vrh zamietol.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Technologick\u00e1 firma sa sna\u017e\u00ed o tom, aby bol paragraf 889 z NDAA vyhoden\u00fd. T\u00fato \u010das\u0165 z\u00e1kona je mo\u017en\u00e9 bezpe\u010dne odstr\u00e1ni\u0165 bez obavy, \u017ee by sa po\u0161kodila cel\u00e1 legislat\u00edva.<\/p>\n
Huawei argumentuje, \u017ee ustanovenie v NDAA, v ktorom je v\u00fdslovne menovan\u00fd, je form\u00e1lnou \u201elistinou\u201c – pri\u010dom tento legislat\u00edvny akt vyhlasuje konkr\u00e9tneho jednotlivca alebo skupinu vinn\u00fdm z nejak\u00e9ho priestupku a trest\u00e1 ich bez riadneho procesu. To je americkou \u00fastavou zak\u00e1zan\u00e9.<\/p>\n
Advok\u00e1ti spolo\u010dnosti tie\u017e tvrdia, \u017ee \u00a7 889 je protipr\u00e1vny, preto\u017ee firma nemohla reagova\u0165 na \u00fadajne d\u00f4kazy proti nej a bojova\u0165 proti obvineniam na s\u00fade, \u010d\u00edm boli poru\u0161en\u00e9 jej pr\u00e1va na riadny proces.<\/p>\n
Ak bude Huawei \u00faspe\u0161n\u00fd, d\u00fafa, \u017ee otvor\u00ed rozhovory s vl\u00e1dou USA.<\/p>\n
Verejn\u00e9 zd\u00f4vodnenie Washingtonu ost\u00e1va st\u00e1le rovnak\u00e9: Huawei \u00fadajne predstavuje potenci\u00e1lne bezpe\u010dnostn\u00e9 riziko – a nie je n\u00edm samo osebe. \u010c\u00ednskeho v\u00fdrobcu u\u017e odstavili na bok aj in\u00e9 vl\u00e1dy, vr\u00e1tane Japonska a Austr\u00e1lie. Mal poskytova\u0165 hardv\u00e9r pre v\u00fdvoj 5G siet\u00ed. USA uv\u00e1dza, \u017ee zariadenia Huawei by mohli dovoli\u0165 \u010d\u00ednskej vl\u00e1de, aby sledovala alebo ovplyv\u0148ovala americk\u00e9 siete. Tak\u00e9to \u0161pekul\u00e1cie Huawei opakovane odmieta.<\/p>\n
Cel\u00e1 situ\u00e1cia a medi\u00e1lny tlak viedli k tomu, \u017ee spolo\u010dnos\u0165 Google pozastavila obchod s Huawei, ktor\u00fd zah\u0155\u0148al poskytovanie hardv\u00e9ru, softv\u00e9ru a k\u013e\u00fa\u010dov\u00fdch technick\u00fdch slu\u017eieb. Kr\u00e1tko na to USA upravili niektor\u00e9 obmedzenia na 90 dn\u00ed, \u010do umo\u017enilo Huawei pr\u00edstup k k\u013e\u00fa\u010dovej technol\u00f3gii, ktor\u00fa potrebuje – vr\u00e1tane tej od spolo\u010dnosti Google.<\/p>\n
Ak Huawei nem\u00e1 pr\u00edstup ku k\u013e\u00fa\u010dov\u00fdm americk\u00fdm technol\u00f3gi\u00e1m, ako s\u00fa komponenty alebo softv\u00e9r pre svoje smartf\u00f3ny, mohlo by to by\u0165 ve\u013emi nepriazniv\u00e9 pre jeho podnikanie. V najhor\u0161om mo\u017enom scen\u00e1ri sa po\u010d\u00edta aj s \u00fapln\u00fdm \u00fapadkom telekomunika\u010dnej div\u00edzie zna\u010dky Huawei.<\/p>\n
<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Pre \u010d\u00ednskeho giganta e\u0161te nie je ni\u010d straten\u00e9, ale mas\u00edvna antikampa\u0148 nepochybne zanech\u00e1 n\u00e1sledky.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archiv","two-columns"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6156\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/instrid.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}